John Day Basin Partnership Project TrackerJohn Day Basin Partnership
  • About
    • John Day Basin Partnership
    • Steering Committee
    • Partnership Meetings
    • Prioritization
    • Monitoring
    • Outreach
  • Projects
    • Project Map
    • Full Project List
  • Program Info
    • Projects by Type
    • Focal Species
    • Implementation and Ecological Results
    • Working Groups
    • LJDWG - Critical Issues
    • Metrics
    • Priority Focus Areas
    • Watersheds
    • Organizations
    • Funding Sources
    • Web Services
  • Log In Toggle Dropdown
    • Forgot Password
    • Request Account
  • Help
    • Request Support
    • Training
    • Release Notes
    • About ProjectFirma
View Fact Sheet

Granite Creek RM 7.5

Back to all Projects
Proposal
Planning/Design
Implementation
Post-Implementation
Completed

Contents

Project Overview

Basics

Restoration of Aquatic Native Fish Habitat
Granite Creek RM 7.5

Implementation
The Granite Creek RM 7.5 Implementation effort is located two miles downstream of Granite, Oregon in Grant County between RM 7.1 and 7.9. Granite Creek is a tributary of the North Fork of the John Day River located within the John Day Partnership’s Upper North Fork John Day Focus Area. The lower portion of the project site is managed by the Umatilla National Forest and the upper portion by private individuals. This effort is a continuation of previous efforts which addressed mine tailings although they did not address floodplain connectivity and stream channel and floodplain complexity.

2017
2020
2021
8/30/2024

Project Attributes

Additional Project Attributes

FIP Status
Receiving FIP Funding
Restoration Actions
11. Perennial Side Channel, 13. Floodplain Pond - Wetland, 14. Alcove, 15. Hyporheic Off-Channel Habitat (Groundwater), 16. Beaver Restoration Management, 18. Riparian Buffer Strip, Planting, 2. Channel Reconstruction, 21. Remove non-native plants, 3. Pool Development, 30. Restore bank lines with LWD - Bioengineering, 32. Improve Thermal Refugia (spring reconnect, other), 4. Riffle Construction, 7. Levee Modification: Removal, Setback, Breach, 9. Restoration of Floodplain Topography and Vegetation

For Land Acquisition and Easement Projects

Project Type
None

Location

To zoom, hold down Shift and drag a rectangle.

  • North Fork Headwaters Focus Area

  • Headwaters NFJDR / Granite / Desolation / Upper Camas / Big Cr NFJDR

Organizations

Funders
  • Bonneville Power Administration
  • Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board
Lead Implementer
  • Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
Partner
  • U.S. Forest Service - Umatilla
Other Partners Private Landowners

Contacts

john zakrajsek - Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) (johnzakrajsek@ctuir.org)

Metrics

Expected Metrics

Number of pools created 8
Number of riffles created 14
Number of structures installed Anchored: Anchored Location: Instream Type of Structure: BDA 11
Number of structures installed Anchored: Anchored Location: Instream Type of Structure: LWD 187
Stream miles treated Treatment Type: instream restoration 0.8 linear stream miles
Stream miles treated Treatment Type: off/side channel habitat created 0.6 linear stream miles
Stream miles treated Treatment Type: riparian planting 0.8 linear stream miles

Reported Metrics

Number of plantings
Total 2021 2020 Units
1,100 850 250 number
Total 1,100 850 250 number

Number of pools created
Total 2021 2020 Units
8 5 3 number
Total 8 5 3 number

Number of riffles created
Total 2021 2020 Units
10 7 3 number
Total 10 7 3 number

Number of structures installed
Anchored Location Type of Structure Total 2021 2020 Units
Anchored Floodplain BDA 11 3 8 number
Anchored Floodplain LWD 79 39 40 number
Anchored Instream LWD 84 48 36 number
Total 174 90 84 number

Stream miles treated
Treatment Type Total 2021 2020 Units
instream restoration 0.65 0.45 0.2 linear stream miles
off/side channel habitat created 0.55 0.25 0.3 linear stream miles
Total 1.2 0.7 0.5 linear stream miles

Financials

Budget

$1,523,187.00
$1,523,187.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) $923,187.00 $0.00 $923,187.00
FIP - Restoration (OWEB) $600,000.00 $0.00 $600,000.00
Total $1,523,187.00 $0.00 $1,523,187.00
Comment: None provided

Reported Expenditures

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $387,582.00 $535,605.00 $923,187.00
FIP - Restoration (OWEB) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $395,248.00 $204,752.00 $600,000.00
Grand Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $782,830.00 $740,357.00 $1,523,187.00

Note: None provided

Focal Species

Focal Species

Critical habitat with project site,
Critical habitat with project site,
Known to exist within Granite Creek basin.
Juvenile and adult life-stages known to occur in project location.

Implementation and Ecological Results

Implementation and Ecological Results

A fifteen year landowner/CTUIR conservation agreement is in place on private land. The Umatilla National Forest manages public lands under a under multidisciplinary/use management scheme.
Within 6 acres of the project site mine tailings will be excavated and/or shaped during the development and improvement of primary and secondary stream channels and adjacent tailing to improve floodplain connectivity in conjunction with riffle development .
Although not technically buffer strip planting native vegetation plantings will include trenched cuttings or potted plants associated with all developed/improved stream channels (Actions #2 & #11), Restoration of floodplain topography (Action # 9), Wetlands (Action # 13), and LWD (Action #28). CTUIR controls invasive weds as part of conservation agreements and will work with the Umatilla National Forest to the extent possible to do so on federally managed lands
development of riffles, side channels, channel meanders, and introduction of large wood structures significantly increased instream complexity and potential for more useful and sustainable sediment deposition and mobilization within the project site. While portions of the floodplain pine trees were aging out it would have taken considerably more than the 80+ years since mining ceased to improve channel and floodplain form and function.
The lack of pre-implementation severely limited access to the few off-channel habitat opportunities available. Most of these were remnants of past mining activity and were wet only by groundwater inundation. Where connectivity did exist, these habitats contained juvenile salmon and trout.
Distributing flows across the floodplain decreases flow celerity and improved groundwater recharge. Increased shade improves water temperature by reducing thermal inputs.
Native plantings to increase shading in the future.
Increased floodplain complexity during high flows, instream complexity at all times, and improved channel form will improve the spatial distribution of aquatic species during all flows.
Stream complexity, floodplain complexity, streamside shade from plantings, and formation and maintenance of gravel bars will all contribute to improved water quality.
Increased instream and floodplain complexity through altered channel morphology, large woody debris structures, pool-riffle-run sequences, BDA development, floodplain grading, and native plantings.
Pre-implementation channel condition was impaired by past mining activity though in better condition than other portions of Granite Creek. That said, available habitat for aquatic species was limited and Granite Creek was simplified and juvenile rearing and while adult spawning existed simplified habitat limited opportunities. Additionally refuge during higher flows was limited with very little floodplain connectivity except at the highest flows.

Working Groups

Working Groups

This project was predominantly a private landowner, /CTUIR, and Umatilla National Forest effort with input from all. The JDBP was kept apprised of the project's development and implementation and updates were provided to the NF/MF John Day working group. The coordination required to develop, design, and implement this effort was significant and coordination with and amongst the working group contributed to the project’s success.

LJDWG - Critical Issues

LJDWG - Critical Issues

Vegetation does not grow well on elevated mine tailing piles. Increasing groundwater elevations through riffle development and floodplain grading improve vegetative growth potential by bringing plants closer to baseflow water levels. Additionally high flows distribution across the floodplain deposits fine materials needed for vegetative growth.
Increasing the number of riffles and variable stream depths will improve the potential for groundwater/surface water exchange and increased water quality. native vegetative growth will improve streamside shade and reduce thermal input into Granite Creek.
Riffle construction, floodplain grading, and side channel development have significantly increase floodplain inundation during spring run-off. The elevated groundwater table and floodplain inundation will deposit fine materials across the floodplain, thus the potential for native hardwood growth has improved as a result of the design's implementation while bring planting closer to baseflow water improves vegetative growth.

Project Details

Attachments

Granite Creek RM 7.5 OWEB Pre & Post Implementation Photos
Uploaded On
3/21/2024
File Type
PDF
Description
Several pre & post implementation photographs for the Granite Creek RM 7.5 restation effort
Granite Creek RM 7.5 2018 Design Specifications
Uploaded On
3/21/2024
File Type
PDF
Description
Design specifications for the Granite Creek RM 7.5 restoration effort
Granite Creek RM 7.5 2018 Design Plan Set
Uploaded On
3/21/2024
File Type
PDF
Description
Design Plan Set for the Granite Creek RM 7.5 restoration effort
Granite Creek RM 7.5 2018 Basis of Design Report
Uploaded On
3/21/2024
File Type
PDF
Description
Design Report for the Granite Creek RM 7.5 restoration effort
Granite Creek RM 7.5 2020 OWEB FIP Presentation
Uploaded On
3/21/2024
File Type
PDF
Description
Presentation to John Day Basin Partnership Technical Team

No attachments

No attachments

Area Map
Uploaded On
1/21/2020
File Type
JPEG
Description

Notes

No Notes entered.

External Links

No External Links entered.

Photos

Photos

  •  

    Looking across Granite Creek at Station 18+00. Both leveled and unleveled tailings are visible.
(Timing: After) (~3,946 KB)
Credit: John Zakrajsek

    Looking across Granite Creek at Station 18+00. Both leveled and unleveled tailings are visible.
    (Timing: After) (~3,946 KB)
  •  

    Looking across Granite Creek at Station 18+00. Both leveled and unleveled tailings are visible.
(Timing: Before) (~1,042 KB)
Credit: CTUIR

    Looking across Granite Creek at Station 18+00. Both leveled and unleveled tailings are visible.
    (Timing: Before) (~1,042 KB)
  •  

    Looking across tailings at meander bend will be created at Station 36+50
(Timing: After) (~450 KB)
Credit: John Zakrajsek

    Looking across tailings at meander bend will be created at Station 36+50
    (Timing: After) (~450 KB)
  •  

    Looking across tailings where a meander bend will be created at Station 36+50
(Timing: Before) (~1,318 KB)
Credit: CTUIR

    Looking across tailings where a meander bend will be created at Station 36+50
    (Timing: Before) (~1,318 KB)
  •  

    Looking upstream to Station 12+00 
(Timing: After) (~2,743 KB)
Credit: John Zakrajsek

    Looking upstream to Station 12+00
    (Timing: After) (~2,743 KB)
  •  

    Looking upstream to Station 12+00 where new meander bend will cross Granite Creek
(Timing: Before) (~1,018 KB)
Credit: CTUIR

    Looking upstream to Station 12+00 where new meander bend will cross Granite Creek
    (Timing: Before) (~1,018 KB)
  •  

    Tailings Pond
(Timing: After) (~3,019 KB)
Credit: John Zakrajsek

    Tailings Pond
    (Timing: After) (~3,019 KB)
  •  

    Tailings pond.
(Timing: Before) (~1,069 KB)
Credit: CTUIR

    Tailings pond.
    (Timing: Before) (~1,069 KB)

Home page photo by Bob Wick, BLM, shared under the Creative Commons 2.0 license.

ProjectFirma is a service provided by Environmental Science Associates (ESA), which builds on the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's EIP Project Tracker. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation. Source code is available on GitHub.

Copyright (C) 2025 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and ESA | Code last updated (compiled) at 2025-07-08 21:24:44.